DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Problems on Address and DNS Configuration
draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-07
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(v6ops WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Bing Liu , Sheng Jiang , Xiangyang Gong , Wendong Wang , Enno Rey | ||
Last updated | 2024-08-05 (Latest revision 2016-08-17) | ||
Replaces | draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Dead WG Document | |
Document shepherd | Fred Baker | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem.all@tools.ietf.org |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) Protocol includes an ICMPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) message. The RA message contains three flags, indicating the availability of address auto-configuration mechanisms and other configuration such as DNS-related configuration. These are the M, O, and A flags, which by definition are advisory, not prescriptive. This document describes divergent host behaviors observed in popular operating systems. It also discusses operational problems that the divergent behaviors might cause.
Authors
Bing Liu
Sheng Jiang
Xiangyang Gong
Wendong Wang
Enno Rey
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)