Technical Summary:
RFC4412 defines "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority
Priority-values" registries. The management policy of these registries
is "Standards Action". This document normatively updates RFC4412 to
change the management policy of these registries to "IETF Review".
Working Group Summary:
Discussion in the SIPCORE working group was minimal. Aside from some
editorial changes, the only substantive comment was a request for
further clarifications to RFC 4412. The suggested additional work
was not taken on in this document.
Document Quality:
The document is a trivial update to RFC 4412, and its purpose is clear
and unambiguous. The document is administrative in nature, and as such
does not propose protocol mechanisms.
Personnel:
Adam Roach is the document shepherd. Richard Barnes is the
responsible area director.
RFC Editor Note
Please make the following edits before publication:
OLD:
"""
Experience
has suggested that a document that only defines a new namespace with
its priorities, and does not create new protocol semantics, should
not be a standards-track document
"""
NEW:
"""
After further consideration, the IETF has concluded that documents that
only define new SIP resource priority namespaces and values do not need
to be on the standards track, since they do not create new protocol
semantics.
"""
OLD:
"""
This document updates [RFC4412]
to change the management policy of the registries to "IETF Review".
"""
NEW:
"""
This document updates RFC 4412 by changing tha IANA management policy
of the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority
Priority-values" registries to "IETF Review".
"""
OLD
"""
The management policy of these
registries is "Standards Action" as defined in [RFC5226].
"""
NEW
"""
The management policy of these
registries defined by RFC 4412 was "Standards Action" as defined in
[RFC5226].
"""