Skip to main content

Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without Server-Side State
draft-salowey-tls-ticket-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Ted Hardie
2006-03-13
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-03-06
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-03-06
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-03-06
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-03-03
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-03-02
2006-03-02
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-03-02
07 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Amy Vezza
2006-03-02
07 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2006-03-02
07 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2006-03-02
07 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2006-03-02
07 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2006-03-01
07 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2006-03-01
07 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2006-03-01
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2006-02-28
07 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2006-02-27
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Ted Hardie
2006-02-27
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2006-02-27
07 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-24
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
Generally,  I think is good stuff, and I expect to vote "Yes" eventually.  I'm concerned, though, about how the draft specifies the server's …
[Ballot discuss]
Generally,  I think is good stuff, and I expect to vote "Yes" eventually.  I'm concerned, though, about how the draft specifies the server's behavior in the case where a ticket is not honored.  Currently, the draft says:

  If the server cannot or does not want to honor the ticket then it can initiate a full handshake
  with the client.

I believe it would be valuable to expand this to describe in detail what happens when the server does not honor a specific ticket but would be willing to provide a new ticket (as, for example, when the ticket has expired) and to distinguish it from cases where the server is not willing to honor any tickets at
this time.  While some of this can be inferred from section 3.3 and 3.4, I think clarification will improve the likelihood of interoperable implementations.  Examples of the type given in 3.1 would be one way to achieve this.

The document also says:

  TLS clients may be given a hint of the lifetime of the ticket.  Since the lifetime of a ticket may be
  unspecified a client has its own local policy which determines when it discards tickets. 

If given, is this hint provided in an established format?  If so, a pointer to that format would be valuable.    If not, some guidance on the necessary elements of a hint would be useful, especially
in light of this statement:

  Clients MUST NOT examine the ticket under the assumption that it
  complies with this document.

The timestamp in the ticket allows the server to expire the ticket, but the client cannot use this
structure to infer the timestamp.  I assume, then, that it must either receive hints which indepdently
reference the time of origination, that the hints use some independent format for time of expiry,
or that it must assume the time of receipt plus some delta (e.g. 24 hours) is appropriate.
2006-02-24
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2006-02-13
07 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-03-02 by Russ Housley
2006-01-26
07 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-07.txt
2005-12-20
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2005-12-20
07 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2005-12-20
07 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2005-12-20
07 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2005-12-16
06 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt
2005-12-12
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2005-11-27
07 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign a TLS extension number (the value 35 is suggested) to the SessionTicket …
IANA Last Call Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign a TLS extension number (the value 35 is suggested) to the SessionTicket TLS extension in the following registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values

IANA will also assign a TLS HandshakeType number to the SessionTicket handshake type located at the following registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters

Please confirm that IANA understands these assignments to go in appropriate registries as described above.
2005-11-14
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2005-11-14
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2005-11-13
07 Russ Housley AD comments sent on 13-Nov-2005.  None are serious enough to delay IETF Last Call.
2005-11-13
07 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2005-11-13
07 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2005-11-13
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-11-13
07 (System) Last call text was added
2005-11-13
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-11-10
07 Russ Housley Draft Added by Russ Housley in state Publication Requested
2005-10-20
05 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-05.txt
2005-09-08
04 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-04.txt
2005-07-15
03 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-03.txt
2005-02-21
02 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-02.txt
2005-02-18
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Eric Rescorla's statement about possible IPR claimed in draft-salowey-tls-ticket-01.txt belonging to Hewlett Packard
2005-02-03
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-salowey-tls-ticket-01
2004-08-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-01.txt
2004-05-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-00.txt