Digital Credential Profiles Best Current Practices
draft-steele-spice-profiles-bcp-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Orie Steele , Michael Prorock , Mahmoud Alkhraishi | ||
| Last updated | 2024-12-19 (Latest revision 2024-06-17) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources |
GitHub Repository
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Digital Credentials are frequently modeled on documents, forms, and messages that enable a holder to prove they have attributes that are acceptable to a verifier. This document provides guidance to verifiers enabling them to describe their requirements such that they can be translated into digital credential profiles.
Authors
Orie Steele
Michael Prorock
Mahmoud Alkhraishi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)