Anonymity, Human Rights and Internet Protocols
draft-tenoever-hrpc-anonymity-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Stéphane Bortzmeyer , Niels ten Oever | ||
| Last updated | 2018-02-09 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-irtf-hrpc-anonymity | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-irtf-hrpc-anonymity | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Anonymity is less discussed in the IETF than for instance security [RFC3552] or privacy [RFC6973]. This can be attributed to the fact anonymity is a hard technical problem or that anonymizing user data is not of specific market interest. It remains a fact that 'most internet users would like to be anonymous online at least occasionally' [Pew]. This document aims to break down the different meanings and implications of anonymity on a mediated computer network.
Authors
Stéphane Bortzmeyer
Niels ten Oever
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)