The Harmful Consequences of the Robustness Principle
draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-03
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2018-03-04 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-iab-protocol-maintenance | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-iab-protocol-maintenance | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-03.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-03.txt
Abstract
Jon Postel's famous statement of "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" is a principle that has long guided the design and implementation of Internet protocols. The posture this statement advocates promotes interoperability, but can produce negative effects in the protocol ecosystem in the long term. Those effects can be avoided by maintaining protocols.
Authors
Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@gmail.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)