Skip to main content

Transferring Opportunistic Wireless Encryption to the IEEE 802.11 Working Group
draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee-02

Yes

Deb Cooley
(Erik Kline)

No Objection

Jim Guichard
(Francesca Palombini)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)

Recuse


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Deb Cooley
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment (2024-08-22) Sent
To add to the ballot text: this draft is short but unusual as it transfers maintenance of an IETF protocol from IETF to IEEE. There are liaison statements in all directions and all parties (authors, IEEE 802.11, IETF trust, and probably the IETF community after the IETF Last Call) agree with the move.

This is somehow urgent as the IEEE is waiting for the IETF, hence the ballot on the day after the IETF Last Call. If there are critical Last Call comments, I am postponing the ballot.

Special note from the IETF Trust: "The authors of RFC8110 are Dan Harkins and Warren Kumari and are also involved in moving the maintenance of this protocol to the IEEE. As authors they hold a shared copyright with the IETF Trust and they both have the ability to give the IEEE the needed rights to use the RFC8110 material in future IEEE works without any approval from the IETF Trust." and later "The IETF Trust will continue in perpetuity to hold its currently held shared rights with the authors on RFC8110 which means that RFC8110 will remain available to the IETF to use and to create derivative works from along with everything else permitted by the TLP licensing terms."
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Comment (2024-08-29) Not sent
short and nicely written document. Thank you
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2024-09-03) Not sent
Thank you to Christer Holmberg for the GENART review.
Erik Kline Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Not sent

                            
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2024-09-02) Sent
I am always happy when opportunistic encryption is used instead of plaintext. I am glad the IEEE was convinced eventually to do this as well.
Francesca Palombini Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2024-09-03) Sent
I assume the question of moving RFC 8110 to some appropriate “don’t use this, use that” status (Obsolete I guess) upon publication of the relevant IEEE spec has been considered by some combination of the authors, sponsoring AD, and extensive Last Call email discussion. In any case I don’t see why it would need to hold up publication of this document.
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Warren Kumari Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse (2024-08-22) Not sent
'manorther...