Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Assertion Control
draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-05
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2005-07-12
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-06-27
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2005-06-27
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2005-06-27
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2005-06-24
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-06-24
|
05 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-06-23 |
|
2005-06-23
|
05 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
|
2005-06-23
|
05 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] Section 1 says: The assertion control allows the client to specify a condition which must be true for the operation to … [Ballot comment] Section 1 says: The assertion control allows the client to specify a condition which must be true for the operation to be processed normally. Otherwise the operation fails. It might be a bit clearer if the second sentence said Otherwise the operation is not performed. After all, it isn't a failure, it's just an IF that evaluated FALSE |
|
2005-06-23
|
05 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] Scetion 1 says: The assertion control allows the client to specify a condition which must be true for the operation to … [Ballot comment] Scetion 1 says: The assertion control allows the client to specify a condition which must be true for the operation to be processed normally. Otherwise the operation fails. It might be a bit clearer if the second sentence said Otherwise the operation is not performed. After all, it isn't a failure, it's just an IF that evaluated FALSE |
|
2005-06-23
|
05 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
|
2005-06-23
|
05 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
|
2005-06-22
|
05 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
|
2005-06-22
|
05 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
|
2005-06-21
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] In section 3: s/Start TLS/StartTLS/ |
|
2005-06-21
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
|
2005-06-21
|
05 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
|
2005-06-16
|
05 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2005-06-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie |
|
2005-06-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie |
|
2005-06-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2005-06-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Ted Hardie |
|
2005-06-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-06-23 by Ted Hardie |
|
2005-06-10
|
05 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
|
2005-05-31
|
05 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register a LDAP Object Identifier in the following registr: SMI Network Management Directory … IANA Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register a LDAP Object Identifier in the following registr: SMI Network Management Directory Codes found at http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers. IANA will also register 1 LDAP Protocol Mechanism and 1 Result Code found at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters. In all of the sections of the IANA Considerations it mentions [BCP64bis]. Does this have any impact on these registrations? It is not clear. |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ted Hardie |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | Ted Hardie | Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2005-05-13
|
05 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2005-03-14
|
05 | Scott Hollenbeck | Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state Publication Requested |
|
2005-02-14
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-05.txt |
|
2004-10-29
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-04.txt |
|
2004-07-23
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-03.txt |
|
2004-06-25
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-02.txt |
|
2003-10-28
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-01.txt |
|
2003-05-12
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-00.txt |