Last Call Review of draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03
review-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-10-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-10-18 | |
Requested | 2013-09-26 | |
Authors | Paul Hethmon , Robert McMurray | |
I-D last updated | 2013-10-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Opsdir Early review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-10-19
|
|
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2013-10-19 |
review-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-10-19-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2013-10-18 IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-18 IESG Telechat date: 2013-10-24 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some comments. Nits/editorial comments: Overall the draft was a bit hard to read but given the long time it has been around I presume it has passed implementers' test when it comes to clarity. Here are a few comments: -[Page 1], Asbtract: A sentence is missing between 1st and 2nd sentence: it should say what is the problem with the fact stated in the 1st sentence. -[Page 5], typo, "accomodate"-->"accommodate" (two occurrences) -[Page 11] section 3.2.2. "the the server-PI "----> extra "the" -[Page 17], Section 3.3 "or otherwise chooses not conform" --> not clear what is not conform -[Page 18], Section 4, not clear what this sentence means: "a server implementation MUST treat an additional HOST command that was sent before a user has been authenticated as though a previous HOST command was not sent. " Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com