Last Call Review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
review-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2022-02-22-00
| Request | Review of | draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-02-25 | |
| Requested | 2022-02-09 | |
| Requested by | Mirja Kühlewind | |
| Authors | Peter Saint-Andre | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-02-22 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -11
by Stig Venaas
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Russ Mundy (diff) Genart Last Call review of -11 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Intdir Last Call review of -11 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -11 by Wesley Eddy (diff) Artart Last Call review of -11 by Thomas Fossati (diff) I18ndir Last Call review of -11 by Martin J. Dürst (diff) |
|
| Comments |
We're aiming to maximize the reviews for all documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. This document is the main deliverable from the RFC future editor model program and describes the new RFC editor model. The more eyes we get on this, the better! |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/y31onn8OQQ1W0LYtc8D3VFsDLIg | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-02-22 |
review-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2022-02-22-00
This Informational document specifies version 3 of the RFC Editor Model. The document does not define or extend any Internet related protocol. There are no implications related to the operation or management of the Internet. It would be useful for the operators to be aware about some of the aspects described in this document and in the related documents, especially in what concerns understanding the status of the RFCs (e.g. which RFC documents represent Internet Standards). I do not see any problem with the publication of this document from the OPS-DIR perspective.