Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

Request Review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
Requested revision 11 (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2022-02-25
Requested 2022-02-07
Requested by Luc André Burdet
Authors Peter Saint-Andre
I-D last updated 2022-02-24
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -11 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Russ Mundy (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -11 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -11 by Wesley Eddy (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -11 by Thomas Fossati (diff)
I18ndir Last Call review of -11 by Martin J. Dürst (diff)
Can you please find a reviewer for this set of documents?   Because this is an IAB document the datatracker seems to not allow me to request a review. 
This is a process document, but an important one in the production of IETF RFCs.  Please assign the review to one of the WG chairs [1] in the directorate.
Assignment Reviewer Stig Venaas
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 13)
Result Has nits
Completed 2022-02-24
I have reviewed the document and it is in good shape.

The document has a few nits found by the idnits tool. The string "RFC" should
not be included when specifing "obsoletes:" or "updates:". Also the abstract
mentions that the documents obsoletes or updates documents that are not listed
by the obsoletes/updates headers.

In paragraph 4:
"participation for those unable to to attend in person."
Double "to".

I'm wondering whether any of the references should be normative, but it may not
make sense for this document.