Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04
review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04-intdir-lc-thaler-2019-11-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2019-11-29 | |
Requested | 2019-11-04 | |
Requested by | Suresh Krishnan | |
Authors | Thomas Watteyne , Pascal Thubert , Carsten Bormann | |
I-D last updated | 2019-11-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Intdir Last Call review of -04
by Dave Thaler
(diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -04 by Ines Robles (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Derrell Piper (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Sarah Banks (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff) Genart Last Call review of -08 by Francesca Palombini (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dave Thaler |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04-intdir-lc-thaler-2019-11-06
|
|
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/I0TK8QHZ6KGh4_YfgJgZaUroHu4 | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | On the Right Track | |
Completed | 2019-11-07 |
The information below is for an old version of the document.
review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04-intdir-lc-thaler-2019-11-06-00
Downgraded status to "On the Right Track" based on Pascal's responses so far indicating that the intent of the document is quite different from what the document reads (to me anyway) as saying at present. Pascal implies the intent is to be a normative specification of behavior, rather than a discussion of tradeoffs between two behaviors specified in other documents, being RFC 4944 and the lwig draft. Such a scope change would require, in my view, more changes to text than simply what I said in my initial review.