Last Call Review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-11
review-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-11-intdir-lc-bernardos-2024-11-04-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-11-01 | |
| Requested | 2024-10-15 | |
| Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
| Authors | Owen Friel , Rifaat Shekh-Yusef , Michael Richardson | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-11-04 | |
| Completed reviews |
Intdir Last Call review of -11
by Carlos J. Bernardos
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Mike Ounsworth Rtgdir Last Call review of -11 by Russ White |
|
| Comments |
The document describes several security mechanisms w.r.t. to CA and TLS that need to be evaluated. It also describes HTTP methods and error codes that should be examined. To the IoT Directorate as this relates to IoT devices. The rest of the reviews are to make sure we have not missed anything. And thanks to the directorates for all your help. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carlos J. Bernardos |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/j4jAI6RXzbmZHduYCykFbhwPMqk | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-11-04 |
review-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-11-intdir-lc-bernardos-2024-11-04-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION. The document is well written and I haven’t found any Internet related issue nor aspect that needs to be clarified. Thanks, Carlos