Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05
review-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05-genart-lc-shirazipour-2017-02-17-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For
more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2017-02-10
IETF LC End Date:   2017-02-10
IESG Telechat date: -

Summary:
This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have comments.

Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
-Abstract:
Current:
"However, the current PMIPv6 specification does not specify related operations
when an HNP renumbering is happened.". Suggestion for more clarity: "However,
the current PMIPv6 specification does not specify related operations when an
HNP renumbering has happened (e.g. due to change of service provider, change of
site topology, etc.).". -[Page 3], "to an MAG"---->"to a MAG"

-[Page 7], "the proceduer"--->"the procedure"

Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research
www.ericsson.com