Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-03
review-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-03-opsdir-lc-jiang-2016-08-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-07-29
Requested 2016-07-25
Authors Stéphane Bortzmeyer, Shumon Huque
Draft last updated 2016-08-08
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Adam Montville (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sheng Jiang
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-03-opsdir-lc-jiang-2016-08-08
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-08-08

Review
review-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-03-opsdir-lc-jiang-2016-08-08






Hi, OPS-DIR, Authors,




 




I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational
 aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.




 




This Standards Track document updates clearly the meaning and rules when a DNS resolver receives a response with response code of NXDOMAIN. It updates RFC 1034, 2308. This document is well written. I don't see any
 major issues from the operations and management perspective. It is ready to be published. There are one of minor comments from me:




 




Section 11.3 lists two URIs, which is rarely see in RFCs. I am sure the first URI should be removed by RFC editor, according to author

’

s
 note. But the second one seems meaning something in the real use. I guess it should be either reorganized as an informational reference or removed.




 




Best regards,




 




Sheng