Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-10
review-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-10-secdir-lc-sethi-2022-10-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-10-19 | |
| Requested | 2022-10-05 | |
| Authors | Boris Makarenko , Vasily Dolmatov | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-10-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10
by Roni Even
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Mohit Sethi (diff) Dnsdir Last Call review of -10 by Jim Reid (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -12 by Scott Rose (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -13 by Jim Reid (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Mohit Sethi |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/9x5kDZn7SjE2OcBBplVETZWrkyo | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-10-09 |
review-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-10-secdir-lc-sethi-2022-10-09-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last-call comments. This document updates the old GOST digital signature and hash algorithm with the new ones for usage in DNSKEY, RRSIG, and DS resource records. Section 8 explains how the paragraph describing the state of GOST algorithms in section 3.1 of RFC 8624 is updated. Why is section 3.3 of RFC 8624 containing the text "GOST R 34.11-2012 has not been standardized for use in DNSSEC." not updated in a similar fashion?