Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03

Request Review of draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-12-04
Requested 2015-11-29
Authors Gustavo Lozano Ibarra
I-D last updated 2015-12-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Russ Housley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Simon Josefsson (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tim Wicinski
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 06)
Result Has nits
Completed 2015-12-04


I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed
      by the IESG.  These 

comments were written with the intent of improving the
      operational aspects of the 

IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call
      may be included in AD reviews 

during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
      should treat these comments 

just like any other last call comments. 

General Summary: Ready with nits

In doing this write up after I wrote my comments, I went
      and researched the mail archive, and I found Russ Housley's very
      succinct Gen-Art review:

Specifically the Appendix in the wrong place, the insertion
      of copyrights in Sections 3.1 and 3.2

Additionally, in Section 2 "Object Description" there are
      elements for the objects that are marked OPTIONAL or MUST.
      However, there are many which are not defined either way.  The
      "assumption" is they are a MUST. If this is true perhaps some text
      at the beginning of the definitions

    "Unless otherwise specified, any element defined is a