Last Call Review of draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03
review-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2015-12-04-00

All,







I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational
      directorate's 




ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed
      by the IESG.  These 




comments were written with the intent of improving the
      operational aspects of the 




IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call
      may be included in AD reviews 




during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
      should treat these comments 




just like any other last call comments. 







General Summary: Ready with nits







In doing this write up after I wrote my comments, I went
      and researched the mail archive, and I found Russ Housley's very
      succinct Gen-Art review:







https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jBbrcEzrRlSPWGcjEVdvTO41ckQ







Specifically the Appendix in the wrong place, the insertion
      of copyrights in Sections 3.1 and 3.2







Additionally, in Section 2 "Object Description" there are
      elements for the objects that are marked OPTIONAL or MUST.
      However, there are many which are not defined either way.  The
      "assumption" is they are a MUST. If this is true perhaps some text
      at the beginning of the definitions







    "Unless otherwise specified, any element defined is a
      MUST". 







tim