Telechat Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
review-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08-genart-telechat-bryant-2017-10-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2017-10-24 | |
| Requested | 2017-10-02 | |
| Authors | Diego Lopez , Edward Lopez, Linda Dunbar , John Strassner , Rakesh Kumar | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-10-15 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -08
by Stewart Bryant
(diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Carlos M. MartÃnez (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Daniel Fox Franke (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Stewart Bryant |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2017-10-15 |
review-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08-genart-telechat-bryant-2017-10-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2017-10-15 IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-25 IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26 Summary: This is a well written document. There are a couple of things the authors need to look at, but it is ready to be published Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: The authors should consider whether the 2119 boilerplate is really needed as no RFC2119 keywords are used (something they point out to the reader) ====== a query-based interface is used by the the I2NSF Management System to obatin information, whereas a report-based interface SB Typo - obtain ===== 9.2. Registration Categories SB> I would think that anything in the IPFIX registry was a candidate for such categories, after all IPFIX is designed and used to monitor flows, often for security reasons.