IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis-07
review-ietf-iotops-7228bis-07-secdir-lc-emery-2026-05-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-05-06 | |
| Requested | 2026-04-22 | |
| Authors | Carsten Bormann , Mehmet Ersue , Ari Keränen , Carles Gomez | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-06-04 (Latest revision 2026-05-15) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Valery Smyslov
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Shawn M Emery (diff) Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Marcus Ihlar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Shawn M Emery |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/LsXZ3EknFTsPEKmVFUhM-D1X4Vg | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-05-06 |
review-ietf-iotops-7228bis-07-secdir-lc-emery-2026-05-06-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This informational draft discusses the terminology used in networks of constrained-devices that will elucidate further standardization work and research in this area. The security considerations section does exist and defers relevant security aspects to i) the general considerations of constrained-device (RFC7252) security mechanisms, ii) specific constrained-device protocol RFCs (e.g., RFC7416 for Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RLP)), iii) the implementation security considerations of security protocols on constrained devices (RFC7815), and iv) a high-level view of constrained-device security (RFC8576). I agree with these assertions and appears to be comprehensive. General comments: None. Editorial comments: None.