Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-11
review-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-11-opsdir-lc-mishra-2023-05-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-05-17 | |
| Requested | 2023-05-03 | |
| Authors | Rakesh Gandhi , Clarence Filsfils , Mach Chen , Bart Janssens , Richard "Footer" Foote | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-05-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -11
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Kathleen Moriarty (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Gyan Mishra (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Tim Chown Secdir Telechat review of -14 by Kathleen Moriarty (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Gyan Mishra |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/keC6x-mX2VxK3zUSv4SaxKJ_BlU | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 18) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-05-21 |
review-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-11-opsdir-lc-mishra-2023-05-21-00
I have been following the draft through its development on ML discussions with the authors and all issues brought up on ML have been resolved. One question brought up on ML related to this draft being Standards Track or Informational. As this draft uses existing mechanisms from STAMP RFC 8762, there were discussions that this draft should be informational. As this draft introduces new procedures for Segment Routing Networks for Performance Measurement SR-PM I believe this draft should be Standards Track. I don’t see any technical issues with this draft. This draft is well written and is ready for publication.