Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
review-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09-opsdir-lc-kuarsingh-2018-04-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-04-27
Requested 2018-04-09
Authors Ruth Civil , Al Morton , Reshad Rahman , Mahesh Jethanandani , Kostas Pentikousis
I-D last updated 2018-04-27
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -00 by Jan Lindblad (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Victor Kuarsingh (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Victor Kuarsingh
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-04-27
review-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09-opsdir-lc-kuarsingh-2018-04-27-00
Dear Authors,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Document Reviewed - Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Data Model
Link to Document - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09

Status: Ready for publication

Summary:

This document specifies a data model for client and server implementations of
the Two-Way Active Measurement protocol (TWAMP).

The document describes and covers the scope and applicability, data model
overview and detailed description of the data model.

General Comments and Feedback:

The document as reviewed is well written had has undergone considerable review.
 No additional items were seen in this review beyond those already address in
previous reviews (and versions) from genart and secdir.

No other comments and/or recommendations are made as part of this review
focused on operational considerations.

regards,

Victor Kuarsingh