Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14
review-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14-opsdir-lc-banks-2014-02-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2014-02-14 | |
Requested | 2014-02-01 | |
Authors | Thomas Nadeau , Kiran Koushik , Rohit Mediratta | |
I-D last updated | 2014-02-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -14
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Sarah Banks (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sarah Banks |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2014-02-06 |
review-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14-opsdir-lc-banks-2014-02-06-00
Hello, I've been asked to provide an OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib(-14). In general, I have no problems with the draft, and I'd like to thank the authors for taking on the awesome task of SNMP. An extremely minor nit, the formatting in section 9 (the justification of text after the RFC reference) is disparate. It'd be nice to fix that, but it's not a gate. Kind regards, Sarah