Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-14
review-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-14-dnsdir-lc-stenstam-2024-02-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2024-02-19
Requested 2024-02-05
Authors Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Bernie Hoeneisen , Alexey Melnikov
I-D last updated 2024-02-19
Completed reviews Dnsdir Last Call review of -14 by Johan Stenstam (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -14 by Bron Gondwana (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -15 by Scott Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Johan Stenstam
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/tSHmTQmzWAkFbLITXDNiAbIW2SY
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-02-19
review-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-14-dnsdir-lc-stenstam-2024-02-19-00
I am the assigned DNSDIR reviewer for this draft. I am knowledgeable in the
area of email, SMTP and crypto in general and I do understand the issues being
discussed. I do not, however, consider myself an expert on the topics covered
in this document.

This document does not contain any references to DNS other than in the sections
for Future Work and several references. As such there is nothing much
DNS-related for me to review.

That said, I like this document and the effort that has been put into it, in
particular given its length. It is very well structured which is much
appreciated.

I expected to have more things to say about structure but in the end I only
have one minor nit in that area: I think it would be easier if you listed at
least the referenced RFCs in numerical order (split into normative and
informative, as needed).

Johan Stenstam