Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-dnsdir-telechat-stenstam-2022-10-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Telechat Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2022-10-25
Requested 2022-10-08
Authors Edgar Ramos , Ana Minaburo
I-D last updated 2022-10-11
Completed reviews Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Spencer Dawkins (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -12 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -12 by Johan Stenstam (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Johan Stenstam
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/ZCWY-pzd8o5odlYfZYG_-pdUQRM
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-10-11
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-dnsdir-telechat-stenstam-2022-10-11-00
The document is extremely acronym dense, which makes it hard to read
for a non-expert reader. However, I do understand that this is nearly
impossible to avoid in this area.

That said, after reading this a couple of times, I think I understand
enough of the topic matter to agree with the way it is presented.

This document does not reference the DNS, and has no considerations
that reflect on the DNS.

A couple of nits, feel free to ignore:

1. 5.4.2. Fragmentation Parameters: Typo (I think): "... bigger than
   304 bits using a 16 bits- Header_size". Should be "... 16 bit
   Header_size", in analogy with prior section. 

2. 5.4.2. Fragmentation Parameters: Redundant line: "W 2 or 3 bits."

3. Both Appendix A and B has a redundant "Appendix" in the title that
   could be removed.