Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-secdir-lc-leiba-2022-09-24-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-10-07 | |
| Requested | 2022-09-23 | |
| Authors | Edgar Ramos , Ana Minaburo | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-04-19 (Latest revision 2022-12-15) | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -12
by Spencer Dawkins
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Barry Leiba (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Sarah Banks (diff) Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Mališa Vučinić (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -12 by Johan Stenstam (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Barry Leiba |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/xS_w5SrU7EnXzrglZsRNFvHO5Dk | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-09-24 |
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-secdir-lc-leiba-2022-09-24-00
Thanks for a very clear document that was easy to read and useful. I think having a document that gives IETFs advice to another SDO is a fine idea that we should do more of. I find nothing to comment on, other than to note that the security considerations say, basically, that this document doesn’t add any considerations to what are already there in the base document and, while that can often be a cop-out, I honestly think it’s correct here and that there’s nothing more to be said.