Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-opsdir-lc-banks-2022-09-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2022-10-07
Requested 2022-09-23
Authors Edgar Ramos , Ana Minaburo
Draft last updated 2022-09-28
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Spencer Dawkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -12 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -12 by Johan Stenstam (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sarah Banks
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-opsdir-lc-banks-2022-09-28
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/7u59EMA5kraHQRKgkVBWNLKW-mM
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-09-28
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-opsdir-lc-banks-2022-09-28-00
Hi,
    The document is well written, and ready to go. This next comment doesn't
    specifically represent the OPS area, but my opinion - while it's nice to
    see us providing feedback to an SDO, I wonder if this is worth the RFC. As
    the document shepherd notes, it was written and reviewed by a very small
    group that has deep experience in the WG - the doc really reads to me like
    a contribution that could be made to the SDO directly by the authors,
    rather than an RFC that says the same thing. I don't gather the impression
    that the recommendations here are controversial, or that the IETF itself is
    really adding substantive value here. That's simply my feedback though; it
    IS well written, and nice to see a fairly thorough and thoughtful document.

Thank you,
Sarah