Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17-tsvart-lc-perkins-2022-12-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 23) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
| Deadline | 2022-12-20 | |
| Requested | 2022-12-06 | |
| Authors | Juan-Carlos Zúñiga , Carles Gomez , Sergio Aguilar , Laurent Toutain , Sandra Cespedes , Diego S. Wistuba La Torre , Julien Boite | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-12-20 | |
| Completed reviews |
Intdir Last Call review of -17
by Jean-Michel Combes
(diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -16 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) Genart Last Call review of -20 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -17 by Colin Perkins (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -18 by Bo Wu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Colin Perkins |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox by Transport Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/H_s7FLTCTliLFxBIpl39KOrOLD8 | |
| Reviewed revision | 17 (document currently at 23) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-12-20 |
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17-tsvart-lc-perkins-2022-12-20-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. This document describes a profile of Static Context Header Compression and fragmentation (SCHC) [RFC 8724] to adapt it to with the Sigfox low-power WAN protocol. The document appears clearly and precisely written, and gives a detailed description of how the mapping of SCHC to Sigfox should operate. It makes use of header compression and fragmentation/reassembly, which are frequent areas of concern for the transport area, but appears to do so in a manner that is consistent with RFC 8724 and draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack, and so doesn't raise any new transport issues.