Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-16
review-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-16-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-03-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-02-29 | |
Requested | 2024-02-15 | |
Authors | Tony Li , Peter Psenak , Huaimo Chen , Luay Jalil , Srinath Dontula | |
I-D last updated | 2024-03-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -16
by Reese Enghardt
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Susan Hares (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/QLujFc_nqA_4awFgkgck5_qE0zc | |
Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 18) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-03-06 |
review-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-16-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-03-06-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. The problem statement and mechanisms to address it are well laid out. The Security Considerations section is appropriate for the document. I found no nits. Best regards, Chris