Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-10
review-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-10-secdir-lc-melnikov-2023-12-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-12-22 | |
| Requested | 2023-12-08 | |
| Authors | Tony Li , Sarah Chen , Vivek Ilangovan , Gyan Mishra | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-12-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10
by Peter E. Yee
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Alexey Melnikov |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SXJPqT2Y_9j_r_6Wi7YMYyAM3NE | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 12) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2023-12-21 |
review-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-10-secdir-lc-melnikov-2023-12-21-00
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review result: Ready with nits Hi. I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. As the document describes an extension to improve scaling of IS-IS, I agree that it doesn't add new security considerations. However the document depends on functionality provided by [I-D.ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding], so referencing its Security Considerations seems appropriate.