Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11
review-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11-genart-lc-enghardt-2023-05-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2023-05-15
Requested 2023-05-01
Authors Zhenbin Li , Zhibo Hu, Ketan Talaulikar , Peter Psenak
I-D last updated 2023-05-10
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Martin Vigoureux (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Reese Enghardt
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/w1UYHLxqOPXlkhCce5DigijrCpo
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-05-10
review-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11-genart-lc-enghardt-2023-05-10-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11
Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
Review Date: 2023-05-10
IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-15
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The document is clear, concise, and well-written. It is ready for
publication as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: None.

Nits/editorial comments:

5. SRv6 SIDs and Reachability
"if the locator associated with SRv6 SID advertisements is the longest
   prefix match installed in the forwarding plane for those SIDs"

Please capitalize the beginning of the paragraph

9. Advertisement of SRv6 SIDs Associated with Adjacencies

"although it MAY omit doing so if features like traffic engineering or
   Topology-Independent Loop Free Alternate (TI-LFA) that requires it
   are not in use"
requires -> require?
I'm not 100% sure what "it" refers to, but I'll assume it refers to a unique
SRv6 End.X SID.

The HTML version of the document looks different from most other recent
documents. Was the most recent tooling used here? If not, please consider
updating the XML format or tooling.