Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-08
review-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-08-rtgdir-lc-vigoureux-2022-09-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2022-09-30
Requested 2022-09-19
Requested by John Scudder
Authors Zhenbin Li , Zhibo Hu, Ketan Talaulikar , Peter Psenak
I-D last updated 2022-09-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Martin Vigoureux (diff)
Comments 
Please assign to Martin Vigoureux. 

(I didn't see a way to reopen Acee's earlier review request https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/reviewrequest/16165/ that I incorrectly closed earlier, so I'm opening this new one, with an updated deadline but otherwise the same.  Sorry for the mix-up.)
Assignment Reviewer Martin Vigoureux
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/y03KYsbGyJ-ocqugKCWqCcwFOhw
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-09-16
review-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-08-rtgdir-lc-vigoureux-2022-09-19-00
Hi,

I apologize for providing this review way past the deadline.
The document is of very good quality and clearly the result of careful 
work, which makes it hard to find anything to say.
Fortunately, I think I've found something :-)


    Types in the range 45056-65535 are not to be assigned at this time.
    Before any assignments can be made in the 33024-65535 range, there
    MUST be an IETF specification that specifies IANA Considerations that
    cover the range being assigned.
I think you mean 45056-65535 rather than 33024-65535 because part of it 
(33024-45055) is covered as FCFS.

Also, this appears twice: Section 13.5 and 13.6

Beyond that, the document looks ready to me.

As a side note, I'm not sure why segments is between double quotes in 
the Abstract.

-m