Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13
review-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13-opsdir-telechat-liu-2023-07-25-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-10-04 | |
Requested | 2022-09-22 | |
Authors | Diego Lopez , Qin Wu , Dhruv Dhody , Qiufang Ma , Daniel King | |
I-D last updated | 2023-07-25 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -05
by Yaron Sheffer
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Ron Bonica (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Will (Shucheng) LIU (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -12 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Will (Shucheng) LIU |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Will (Shucheng) LIU |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/z6JhEoiVX-mDVOet9eIZxPuz9Ng | |
Reviewed revision | 13 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2023-07-25 |
review-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13-opsdir-telechat-liu-2023-07-25-00
Hi all, I have reviewed draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13 as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. “ When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router (LSR) or a server participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), its presence and path computation capabilities can be advertised using IGP flooding. The IGP extensions for PCE Discovery (PCED) (RFCs 5088 and 5089) define a method to advertise path computation capabilities using IGP flooding for OSPF and IS-IS, respectively. However, these specifications lack a method to advertise Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) security (e.g., Transport Layer Security (TLS) and TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO)) support capability.” My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication. ** Technical ** No. ** Editorial ** No. (I thought I finished my review for version -10, however, it seems the second round of review was missed by me) Regards, Will (Shucheng LIU)