Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13
review-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13-opsdir-telechat-liu-2023-07-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2022-10-04
Requested 2022-09-22
Authors Diego Lopez , Qin Wu , Dhruv Dhody , Qiufang Ma , Daniel King
I-D last updated 2023-07-25
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Will (Shucheng) LIU (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -12 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Will (Shucheng) LIU
Assignment Reviewer Will (Shucheng) LIU
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/z6JhEoiVX-mDVOet9eIZxPuz9Ng
Reviewed revision 13
Result Ready
Completed 2023-07-25
review-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13-opsdir-telechat-liu-2023-07-25-00
Hi all,

I have reviewed draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13 as part of the
Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being
processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of
improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not
addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

“ When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router
   (LSR) or a server participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol
   (IGP), its presence and path computation capabilities can be
   advertised using IGP flooding.  The IGP extensions for PCE Discovery
   (PCED) (RFCs 5088 and 5089) define a method to advertise path
   computation capabilities using IGP flooding for OSPF and IS-IS,
   respectively.  However, these specifications lack a method to
   advertise Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
   security (e.g., Transport Layer Security (TLS) and TCP Authentication
   Option (TCP-AO)) support capability.”

My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication.

** Technical **

No.

** Editorial **

No.

(I thought I finished my review for version -10, however, it seems the second
round of review was missed by me)

Regards,
Will (Shucheng LIU)