Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-05
review-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-05-rtgdir-lc-smith-2019-03-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-04-05 | |
| Requested | 2019-03-13 | |
| Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
| Authors | Bow-Nan Cheng , David Wiggins , Lou Berger | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-03-29 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -05
by Andy Smith
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Stephen Kent (diff) Genart Last Call review of -05 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Bob Briscoe (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Andy Smith |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2019-03-29 |
review-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-05-rtgdir-lc-smith-2019-03-29-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension Reviewer: Andy Smith Review Date: 29 March 2019 Summary: This document is well written and easy to understand. I see no reason it cannot be published. Comments: This document is well written and easy to understand. I see no reason it cannot be published. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Nits: It might be helpful to expand the acronym "TBA" in the requested Data Item Type field.