Last Call Review of draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09
review-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2022-05-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-06-08
Requested 2022-05-25
Authors David Schinazi , Lucas Pardue
I-D last updated 2022-05-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Ines Robles (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -09 by Claudio Allocchio (diff)
Assignment Reviewer David Mandelberg
State Completed
Review review-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2022-05-27
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/wfAmjZ8L8U8ohOI01xPD03Mg5DU
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-05-27
review-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2022-05-27-00
I did not notice any security issues with this document, and the security
considerations section seems straightforward.

(nit / question / feel free to ignore) I was a bit confused by the term "HTTP
extensions" at first, but from context, I'm guessing it's used loosely to mean
any addition to HTTP? I found RFC 2774 when I was looking to see if it meant
something specific, but I'm guessing it's not a reference to a 20+ year old
experimental RFC?