Last Call Review of draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09
review-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2022-05-27-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-06-08 | |
| Requested | 2022-05-25 | |
| Authors | David Schinazi , Lucas Pardue | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-05-27 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10
by Ines Robles
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by David Mandelberg (diff) Artart Last Call review of -09 by Claudio Allocchio (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | David Mandelberg |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/wfAmjZ8L8U8ohOI01xPD03Mg5DU | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-05-27 |
review-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-09-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2022-05-27-00
I did not notice any security issues with this document, and the security considerations section seems straightforward. (nit / question / feel free to ignore) I was a bit confused by the term "HTTP extensions" at first, but from context, I'm guessing it's used loosely to mean any addition to HTTP? I found RFC 2774 when I was looking to see if it meant something specific, but I'm guessing it's not a reference to a 20+ year old experimental RFC?