Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05
review-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-02-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-02-26 | |
| Requested | 2016-02-15 | |
| Authors | Suhas Nandakumar | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-04-29 (Latest revision 2016-02-29) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Meral Shirazipour Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Adam W. Montville (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Sarah Banks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2016-02-26 |
review-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-02-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2016-02-22 IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-26 IESG Telechat date: NA Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 2,3], please spell out RTP, SDP, AVPF at first use. -[Page 2] "simulation data" is listed as real time along with audio, video. I suggest removing it and putting "time critical application" if that is what we want to convey. -[Page 5], Section 5, "in the Section 3"---->"in Section 3" Best regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com