Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-secdir-lc-salowey-2011-08-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2011-08-09 | |
Requested | 2011-06-17 | |
Authors | George Swallow , Nitin Bahadur , Kireeti Kompella | |
I-D last updated | 2011-08-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -??
by Joseph A. Salowey
Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Michael Scharf |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Completed | 2011-08-05 |
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-secdir-lc-salowey-2011-08-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes modifications to LSP Ping to allow it to work with MPLS tunnels. It is possible that in some cases a provider may not want to disclose information about tunnels. The security considerations in the document describe mechanisms to keep this information private. In addition the security considerations reference RFC 4379 which seems sufficient. One nit: the first sentence in section 1 is missing a closing parenthesis. Joe