Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38
review-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38-intdir-telechat-jiang-2024-02-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 40) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-02-25 | |
| Requested | 2024-02-12 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Kent Watsen | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-02-25 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -37
by Elwyn B. Davies
(diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -38 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -36 by Qin Wu (diff) Yangdoctors Last Call review of -03 by Andy Bierman (diff) Yangdoctors Last Call review of -24 by Andy Bierman (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Barry Leiba (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sheng Jiang |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/NEFfr9kmwYMZkF8XpVFE6dKKzKs | |
| Reviewed revision | 38 (document currently at 40) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-02-25 |
review-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38-intdir-telechat-jiang-2024-02-25-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the IntArea directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38 Reviewer: Sheng Jiang Review Date: 2024-02-25 Result: Ready This Standards Track document specifies IETF modules that define features and groupings to model "generic" SSH clients and SSH servers. This document is well-written clearly define the newly increased field and the relevant behaviors. It is READY for publication from the INT area perspective. Besides, I did notice, on the datatracker page of this document, it shows "11 errors" for Yang Validation. I am not a YANG expert. But from my glance, I guess it is the Yang validation tool of our datatracker a little bit too sensentive.