Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04
review-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2016-03-17-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-02-16 | |
Requested | 2016-02-04 | |
Authors | Kent Watsen , Thomas Nadeau | |
I-D last updated | 2016-03-17 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Christer Holmberg
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Tero Kivinen Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Al Morton |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2016-03-17 |
review-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2016-03-17-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 17 March 2016 IETF LC End Date: 16 February 2016 IETF Telechat Date: N/A Summary: The document is almost ready for publication, but I have a couple of editorial comments that I’d like to authors to address. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Editorial Issues: Q1: The Abstract and Introduction begins with the following statement: "This document primarily regards the difference between the intended configuration and the applied configuration of a device and how intended and applied configuration relate to the operational state of a device.” I think you need to have some introductory text before that, which describes e.g. what kind of “device” you are talking about. Q2: Section 3 contains requirements. However, in many cases it is unclear whether they apply to “clients”, “servers”, or to something else.