Early Review of draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-17
review-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-17-secdir-early-thaler-2025-10-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-10-24 | |
| Requested | 2025-10-08 | |
| Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
| Authors | Robert Wilton , Scott Mansfield | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-29 (Latest revision 2025-10-08) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -14
by Per Andersson
(diff)
Opsdir Early review of -17 by Linda Dunbar Genart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Susan Hares Secdir Early review of -17 by Dave Thaler Intdir Early review of -17 by Darren Dukes |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Dave Thaler |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/iK8uv7Qx-g2ICzb4O6rn3ykOReU | |
| Reviewed revision | 17 | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-10-20 |
review-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-17-secdir-early-thaler-2025-10-20-00
I was the SECDIR reviewer for this document. In my view this document is ready, but I found a couple of nits that the RFC-Editor would likely catch as well. 1. Some acronyms need to be expanded on first use since they do not have "*" by them at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list. These include at least: LAG, PCP, DEI 2. The draft is internally inconsistent in terms of whether a comma follows "e.g." and "i.e." or not. I believe the RFC Editor follows Chicago Manual of Style here and always puts a comma after them. Dave