Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
review-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11-secdir-lc-wallace-2023-07-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-07-11 | |
| Requested | 2023-06-27 | |
| Authors | Xiao Min , Greg Mirsky , Santosh Pallagatti , Jeff Tantsura , Sam Aldrin | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-07-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -11
by Carl Wallace
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Genart Last Call review of -11 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -10 by Magnus Westerlund (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -12 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_SH17bX5Y_vXWXc_2EvzllvCjXs | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-07-11 |
review-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11-secdir-lc-wallace-2023-07-11-00
The draft describes the use of the BFD protocol with Geneve tunnels. The draft is well-written and clear. As someone not familiar with either BFD or Geneve I had one question. The security considerations section references RFC8926 but not RFC5880. Should it reference RFC5880? In particular, the authentication mechanisms in 5880 seem potentially worth mentioning, even if only to discount their use.