Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07-tsvart-lc-duke-2024-04-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-06 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | 06 (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
Deadline | 2024-04-26 | |
Requested | 2024-04-13 | |
Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Benoît Claise | |
I-D last updated | 2024-04-16 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -09
by Hilarie Orman
(diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Martin Duke (diff) Intdir Last Call review of -08 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Opsdir Early review of -03 by Qin Wu (diff) Genart Early review of -03 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Martin Duke |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes by Transport Area Review Team Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/nByyZoniu0GZwEEIfK1kn4AVa9w | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2024-04-16 |
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07-tsvart-lc-duke-2024-04-16-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. This document does some housekeeping on the IPFIX Information Elements registry, to conform to a standard table format and fix other minor errors. There are no transport protocol implications. The reference to the port registry is correct. It might be good for PortRangeStart and PortRangeEnd to clarify that the linked registry is not just for TCP, but also UDP, SCTP, and DCCP.