Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-17
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-17-genart-early-sarikaya-2025-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 23)
Type Early Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-05-09
Requested 2025-04-28
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Thomas Graf , Benoît Claise , Alex Huang Feng
I-D last updated 2026-04-24 (Latest revision 2025-09-30)
Completed reviews Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Martin Duke (diff)
Genart Early review of -17 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Perfmetrdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Qin Wu (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -19 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -20 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Comments 
Normally, a GENART review is done later in the process. For this document, Martin Duke suggested that the document could do with some editing for clarity.
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/SwU9sBGqkQ9DXFnp4SrKufb19Bs
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 23)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2025-05-09
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-17-genart-early-sarikaya-2025-05-09-00
This document defines new IPFIX IEs to export measured delay. It is well written with a few nits.

Nits:
Introduction: par. 4 IPIFX -> IPFIX

draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark-10 new release 11 exists 

srhActiveSegmentIPv6 and
srhIPv6ActiveSegment both seem to mean Active SRv6 Segment and also they are the same?

Table 2: R3 and R4 have the same address, not sure if there is an issue there?

Section 5 starts referring to IEs with their IDs with no explanation