Last Call Review of draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09
review-ietf-p2psip-share-09-genart-lc-miller-2016-10-25-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-p2psip-share |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-10-25 | |
Requested | 2016-10-13 | |
Authors | Alexander Knauf , Thomas C. Schmidt , Gabriel Hege , Matthias Wählisch | |
I-D last updated | 2016-10-25 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Matthew A. Miller
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Russ Housley (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Rick Casarez (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Matthew A. Miller |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-p2psip-share by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2016-10-25 |
review-ietf-p2psip-share-09-genart-lc-miller-2016-10-25-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq >. Document: draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09 Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller Review Date: 2016-11-02 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-25 IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03 Summary: This document is ready to be published as a Standards Track document once the nits are addressed. Major issues: NONE Minor issues: NONE Nits/editorial comments: * idnits reports a stale reference to I-D.ietf-p2psip-sip (should be RFC 7904). * In 5.1. "Overview", the word "witch" should be "which". * In 5.3. "Overlay Configuration Document Extension", there should be a space between "P2PSIP" and "[I-D.ietf-p2psip-sip]". * In 6.2. "Revoking White Access", there should be a space between "see" and "[RFC6940]". * In 6.4. "Operations of Storing Peers", a comma is missing between "peers" and "at" in the phrase "Storing peers at which Shared Resource and ACL are physically stored ...". Non-issue comments: * idnits is reporting weird spacing and "possible code", but that appears to be due to the Relax NG grammar. In my opinion the nit can be safely ignored. -- - m&m Matt Miller Cisco Systems, Inc. Attachment: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature