Last Call Review of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-04-28
Requested 2015-04-16
Authors Peter Saint-Andre , Alexey Melnikov
I-D last updated 2015-04-21
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2015-04-21
review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 21Apr2015
IETF LC End Date: 28Apr2015
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled

Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with one minor nit

This is a very easy to read document for such a detail-rich protocol.

Nit:

The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of
strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with
LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email
addresses (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid
examples of usernames.