Last Call Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42
review-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42-rtgdir-lc-rogge-2020-12-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 44) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-12-09 | |
Requested | 2020-11-16 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Ines Robles , Michael Richardson , Pascal Thubert | |
I-D last updated | 2021-04-27 (Latest revision 2021-01-15) | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -25
by Henning Rogge
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -25 by Daniel Migault (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -25 by Colin Perkins (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -25 by Russ Housley (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -40 by Mališa Vučinić (diff) Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -42 by Mališa Vučinić (diff) Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -42 by Henning Rogge (diff) |
|
Comments |
This document already went through last call, but it is now returning due to some changes. The reviewer can look at the diffs (the last version to be approved was -31). Thanks! |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Henning Rogge |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/O_K49mAusBGkruydCtCiam8DuTs | |
Reviewed revision | 42 (document currently at 44) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-12-06 |
review-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42-rtgdir-lc-rogge-2020-12-06-00
Hello, the Rtgdir asked me again to review the draft "useofrplinfo" (last review I did was for draft 25). Please note that I do NOT follow the ROLL WG. The draft has made a huge step forward in readability compared to last year. The extended terminology section helps a lot to understand the document. All the figures/tables have been cleaned up considerably and they all use the "Figure" term instead a mixture of figures and tables. Abbreviations are also used more consistently, which both helps with the table cleanup and the readability in general. I think draft 42 resolves the issues I had in my earlier review. Henning Rogge