Last Call Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42
review-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42-rtgdir-lc-rogge-2020-12-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 44)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2020-12-09
Requested 2020-11-16
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Ines Robles , Michael Richardson , Pascal Thubert
I-D last updated 2020-12-06
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -25 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -25 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -25 by Colin Perkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -25 by Russ Housley (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -40 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -42 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -42 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Comments 
This document already went through last call, but it is now returning due to some changes.  The reviewer can look at the diffs (the last version to be approved was -31).  Thanks!
Assignment Reviewer Henning Rogge
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/O_K49mAusBGkruydCtCiam8DuTs
Reviewed revision 42 (document currently at 44)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-12-06
review-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42-rtgdir-lc-rogge-2020-12-06-00
Hello,

the Rtgdir asked me again to review the draft "useofrplinfo" (last review I did
was for draft 25). Please note that I do NOT follow the ROLL WG.

The draft has made a huge step forward in readability compared to last year.

The extended terminology section helps a lot to understand the document.
All the figures/tables have been cleaned up considerably and they all use the
"Figure" term instead a mixture of figures and tables. Abbreviations are also
used more consistently, which both helps with the table cleanup and the
readability in general.

I think draft 42 resolves the issues I had in my earlier review.

Henning Rogge