Early Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-13
review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-13-secdir-early-vucinic-2023-12-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Early Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2023-12-11
Requested 2023-11-27
Requested by Jim Guichard
Authors Acee Lindem , Aditya Dogra
I-D last updated 2023-12-12
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -12 by Russ White (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -13 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Secdir Early review of -13 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -15 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Secdir Early review of -03 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -02 by Tim Chown (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mališa Vučinić
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/NU6RHLjQYzKo8YD75JXK_vK75T0
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-12-12
review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-13-secdir-early-vucinic-2023-12-12-00
I have previously reviewed this document in its -03 version. The document
updates RFC 5798. The Security Considerations sections is updated with light
editorial fixes and inclusive terminology. Also, my previous comment on the
inconsistency in Section 1.1 has been addressed. In summary, there are no
additional technical considerations in the Security Considerations section of
this document compared with the RFC 5798 version so I mark the document as
ready.