Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-12

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2023-12-08
Requested 2023-11-24
Requested by Jim Guichard
Authors Acee Lindem , Aditya Dogra
I-D last updated 2023-12-07
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -12 by Russ White (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -13 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Secdir Early review of -13 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -15 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Secdir Early review of -03 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -02 by Tim Chown (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ White
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-12-07

I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this 

The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, 
perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for 
publication to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time 
during the draft’s lifetime as a working group document. The purpose of 
the early review depends on the stage that the document has reached.

As this document has recently been adopted by the working group, my 
focus for the review is on providing a new perspective on the work, with 
the intention of catching any issues early on in the document's life 

For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-12.txt
Reviewer: Russ White
Review Date: 7 Dec 2023
Intended Status: Proposed Standard


No issues found. This documents is ready to proceed to the IESG.

This draft is well written and easily readable. Thanks to the authors 
for the effort in making certain the figures and text are clear and 
protocol explanation is easy to understand.

I don't see any changes or nits in this document.

:-) /r