Last Call Review of draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-09
review-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-09-artart-lc-sparks-2025-01-11-00

I don't object to this document being published as an Informational RFC, but I
have some observations for the group and the IESG to consider.

It's really not clear _why_ this document is being published as an
Informational RFC, Perhaps this, along with the -inter- document could be taken
together and then used to refine the group's charter text rather than
publishing them as separate RFCs?

It's hard to believe that the gap analysis here is _complete_. Rather, I think
it's trying to identify a set of problems for which there is consensus to do
some engineering work around.

If it will help make the Internet better to publish this document to help steer
the group to appropriate technical work, then do so. But consider making it
clearer what its purpose is.

(As this is an art-art review, I'll note explicitly that there are no ART
specific considerations to vet in this document).