Last Call Review of draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-10
review-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-10-opsdir-lc-banks-2025-01-24-00

Hi authors!
I appreciate that you took the time to think through and write a well written
gap analysis draft. I believe I understand the intent, and I applaud it. That
said, my opinion is that generally, these types of documents are not ones I'd
expect to see as an RFC; they'd either guide the WG into some work stream
doc(s), or roll into one of those docs directly. I can see the case for
exceptions. For example, sometimes issues with requirements and implementation
are thorny enough where having a "discussion" doc could make sense. However,
this draft covers requirements that are somewhat broad, with no consideration
for any of the issues or obstacles to overcome, or tradeoffs in one approach
versus another, where the requirements are potentially OK by themselves, but
without anything else with them, I find it a good discussion point, but not an
informational RFC.