IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-21
review-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-21-secdir-lc-schwartz-2026-03-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2026-03-16
Requested 2026-02-23
Requested by Jim Guichard
Authors Lancheng Qin , Dan Li , Jianping Wu , Mingqing(Michael) Huang , Nan Geng
I-D last updated 2026-05-20 (Latest revision 2026-05-20)
Completed reviews Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Benjamin M. Schwartz (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -09 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Tim Evens (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -21 by Chongfeng Xie (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -21 by Benjamin M. Schwartz (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Benjamin M. Schwartz
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/GrX0HLFFlcPQ7_l6h_UWqePG2DU
Reviewed revision 21 (document currently at 25)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-03-11
review-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-21-secdir-lc-schwartz-2026-03-11-00
I don't think there is any need to publish this draft.  It is not useful
outside of the working group that wrote it.  The IESG generally does not
recommend publication for this type of document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-support-documents-in-ietf-working-groups-20230824/

No security issues.

Section 1:

   Access networks have already deployed SAV mechanisms.
...
   However, access-network SAV mechanisms are not universally deployed.

Nit: Apparent contradiction.